Live Intelligence
Bitcoin Developer Quantum Urgency Map
Where do Bitcoin's most influential protocol developers stand on quantum-resistant cryptography? 52 developers ranked by influence, scored on urgency. Every claim sourced from primary data.
Influence vs. Urgency
Urgent
Proactive
Cautious
Dismissive
No view
Key Insight
Scorecard
| # | Developer | Affiliation | Score | Position Summary | Source |
|---|
Methodology
Stage 01
Power Map
Soft fork archaeology from Pay-to-Script-Hash through Taproot. Weighted recent forks heavily. All affiliations verified against April 2026 sources.
Stage 02
Sentiment Mining
Primary-source research across bitcoin-dev mailing list, academic papers, Bitcoin Improvement Proposals, Delving Bitcoin, X, conferences, and podcasts.
Stage 03
Urgency Scorecard
Scored 1-5 based on verified evidence. 1 = no known view. 5 = actively pushing for imminent post-quantum protocol changes.
Stage 04
Visualization
Bubble scatter chart. X = influence rank. Y = urgency score. Bubble size = volume of post-quantum work. Color = urgency category.
Machine-readable data for all 52 developers, scores, sources, and metadata:
/data.json